User Account
- Personal Profile: Sign in
- or Create
- See all online law products
- Browse all
- Geographic regions
- Jurisdictions
- Content type
- Constitutional instruments and materials
- Current constitutions
- Constitutional amendments
- Constitutional foundation documents
- Constitutionally related documents
- National instruments and materials
- National legislation
- Commentary and analysis
- Book content
- Encyclopedia entries
- Bibliographies
- Constitutional overviews (by jurisdiction)
- Chronologies
- Notes
- US State
- United States [us]
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- United States Minor Outlying Islands [um]
- United States Freely Associated States
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- Subject
-
My Content (1)
Recently viewed (1)
Subscriber sign in
Legitimacy Gap - Secularism, Religion, and Culture in Comparative Constitutional Law by Depaigne, Vincent (13th July 2017)
- Preliminary Material
- Main Text
- Introduction: The Secular State and Its Legitimacy
- Part I The Secular State Between Procedural and Substantive Legitimacy
- 1 The ‘Legitimacy Gap’ in the Secular State
- 1 Secularization, Religion, and Legitimacy
- 2 Max Weber and Legitimacy in the Secular State
- 3 The Social Contract as a Response to the ‘Legitimacy Gap’
- 4 Conclusion: Substantive vs Procedural Legitimacy
- 2 Constitution and Legitimacy: Procedural or Substantive?
- 1 The Move towards Procedural Legitimacy: Democratic Rule and the Decline of the Legitimacy of Human Rights
- 2 Substantive Forms of Legitimacy: Locating Culture in the Secular State
- 3 The Problem of Contemporary Legitimacy: Defining ‘the People’
- 1 The ‘Legitimacy Gap’ in the Secular State
- Part II Models of Reconciliation Between Constitutional Law and Culture
- 3 Locating Culture in the Secular State: Constitutional Law, Secularization, and the Status of Culture
- 1 Locating Culture in Contemporary Constitutional Law
- 2 Models of Constitutional Legitimacy: Articulating Procedure and Substance
- 4 The Secular Nation: France, or the Limits of the ‘Neutral Model’
- 1 Defining the People: The Outer Limits of the Secular State
- 2 ‘Writing the Republic’: The Constitution, the French People, and Overseas Territories
- 3 Can Laïcité Define a Political Community?
- 4 Conclusion: A ‘Nationalization’ of Secularism?
- 5 ‘Reformist’ Secularism: Reconciling Pluralism, Equality, and Unity in India
- 1 Defining the People: The Origins of the Indian ‘Model’ of Secularism
- 2 Indian Secularism as ‘Ameliorative Secularism’
- 3 Pluralism and Secularism: The Shah Bano Case
- 4 Conclusion: Secularism between Pluralism and ‘Hinduization’
- 6 Malaysia: ‘Asymmetric’ Secularism
- 1 The Malaysian ‘Social Contract’: A Secular ‘Ethnic Democracy’?
- 2 The Position of Islam in Malaysia: A Secular and Islamic State?
- 3 De-Secularization: Malaysia as a Secular and Religious State?
- Conclusion: Between ‘De-Secularization’ and ‘Nationalization’
- 3 Locating Culture in the Secular State: Constitutional Law, Secularization, and the Status of Culture
- Further Material
