From: Oxford Constitutions (http://oxcon.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2023. All Rights Reserved.date: 11 December 2024
- Subject(s):
- Judicial review of legislation — Judicial independence — Judicial review
General Editors: Rainer Grote, Frauke Lachenmann, Rüdiger Wolfrum
Managing Editor: Martina Mantovani
1. The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany’s (Bundesverfassungsgericht) (BVerfG) Lüth decision of 15 January 1958 must be viewed against the historical background of a Weimar Republic Constitution that was silent on the question of substantive, as opposed to procedural, judicial review of federal laws (Lenoir 365, 366). A lively debate on the topic as well as the Reichsgericht’s attempt in 1929 to establish substantive judicial review by, for the first time, holding a federal statute unconstitutional were cut short by Hitler’s ascent to power on 30 January...
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please subscribe, or log in via the Sign in panel on the left of this screen to access all subscribed content.