There have been two proposals to repeal this article. The first was rejected by the voters on November 5, 1974, and the second was rejected on November 2, 1976.
Section 1 Power of Impeachment in House—Majority Required
Both the 1974 and 1976 proposals to repeal this section would have incorporated similar provisions in Section 13 of Article III.
Section 2 Trial of Impeachments—Presiding Officer
Similar to the 1974 and 1976 proposals to repeal Section 1, the proposals to repeal Section 2 would have incorporated similar provisions in a new Section (p. 234) 13 of Article III, with the exception that there would have been no requirement that the chief justice preside at a trial of the lieutenant governor and no requirement to put senators on oath.
Section 3 Officers Subject to Impeachment—Grounds—Removal from Office—Criminal Prosecution
The 1974 and 1976 proposals to repeal this section would have incorporated in a new Section 13 of Article III certain provisions authorizing the legislature to determine the manner, procedure, and causes for impeachment. Also to be included in that new Section 13 of Article III would have been provisions similar to those contained in the present Section 3, limiting the effect of a judgment on impeachment and permitting further prosecution.
As the supreme court held in an early case, this section does not prohibit a governor from removing at his pleasure the insurance commissioner, since Sections 3 and 4 of Article XVI apply only to the officers named in the constitution (State ex rel. Ayers v. Kipp, 1898).
Section 4 Removals of Officers Not Subject to Impeachment
Both the 1974 and 1976 proposals to repeal this section would have incorporated into a new Section 13 of Article III a sentence providing:
Other proceedings for removal from public office may be provided by law or this constitution.
According to the South Dakota Supreme Court, the power of the governor to remove state officers may be exercised only for the causes specified in the constitution and relevant statutes (Craig v. Jensen, 1938). However, when reviewing a governor’s removal of a state officer for cause, the supreme court should not substitute its judgment for that of the governor and should sustain the governor’s action if there is any competent evidence tending to support that action (Craig v. Jensen, 1938).(p. 235)
Section 5 Suspension of Duties Between Impeachment and Acquittal
The 1974 and 1976 proposals to repeal this section were rejected by the voters in a general election.
Section 6 Lieutenant Governor Not to Try Governor
The 1974 and 1976 proposals to repeal this section were rejected by the voters in a general election.
Section 7 Service of Copy of Impeachment Before Trial Required
The 1974 and 1976 proposals to repeal this section were rejected by the voters in a general election.
Section 8 Impeachment Twice for Same Offense Prohibited
The 1974 and 1976 proposals to repeal this section were rejected by the voters in a general election.(p. 236)