User Account
- Personal Profile: Sign in
- or Create
- See all online law products
- Browse all
- Geographic regions
- Jurisdictions
- Content type
-
- Constitutional instruments and materials
- Current constitutions
- Constitutional amendments
- Constitutional foundation documents
- Constitutionally related documents
-
- National instruments and materials
- National legislation
- Commentary and analysis
- Book content
- Encyclopedia entries
- Bibliographies
- Constitutional overviews (by jurisdiction)
- Chronologies
- Notes
-
- US State
-
- United States [us]
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- United States Minor Outlying Islands [um]
- United States Freely Associated States
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
-
- Subject
-
My Content
(0)
Recently viewed (0)
-
My Searches (0)
Recently viewed (0)
Subscriber sign in
- Preliminary Material
- Main Text
- Introduction
- 1 Tribal Membership Governance and the Cultural Production of Indigeneity: Reflecting Inter‐indigenous Recognition in Public Policy
- Introduction
- I: Recognition in Pluralist Theory: Giving Public Meaning to Culture
- Culture, continuity, and constitution: the recognition and transformation of tribal communities
- ‘New culture’ and the cultural production of indigeneity
- Recognition of cultural production: human boundaries in relational pluralism
- New culture and its discontents: consequences for indigenous continuity claims
- II: Tribal Practice: Enrolment and Recognition in Tribal Membership Governance
- Tribes are descent‐based communities but self‐constitute relationally
- a Tribes use tribe‐specific definitions of descent and also recruit non‐descendants
- b ‘Descent’ can be reframed to serve tribal purposes
- c The descent class is supplemented by rules allowing the enrolment of non‐descendants
- d Tribes sometimes include non‐descendants as honorary, associate, and probationary members
- Shared residency is not an essential element of constitutionalized tribalism
- Tribes use concepts of indigeneity in the governance of membership
- Voluntary and associational characteristics of tribes: resignation and disenrolment
- Tribes are descent‐based communities but self‐constitute relationally
- III: Operationalizing Indigenous Recognition Practices in Public Law and Policy
- IV: Conclusion
- 2 Tribalism Constitutionalized: The Tribal Governance of Membership in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States
- 3 Descent and Genealogy: The Changing Landscape of Tribal Membership Governance in the United States
- Introduction
- I: Race, genealogy, and tribes: normative controversies
- II: Formal Federal Influences on US Tribal Constitutionalism
- III: The Federal Concept of Blood Quantum and Its Enduring Influence on Tribes
- IV: Changes in Tribal Membership Governance: The Genealogic Shift
- V: Explaining Membership Changes: The Mutual Influences of Ideology, Money, and Documentation
- VI: Conclusion
- 4 Tribal Constitutionalism and Historic Claims: The Impact of Claims Settlement on Tribal Membership Governance in Australia and New Zealand
- Introduction
- I: The Normative Challenge of Tribal Constitutionalism—The Consequences of Formalizing Membership Rules
- II: The Function of Descent Rules in the Claims Process and Post‐claim Tribal Governance
- III: Separating Culture and Governance: Strategies for Managing ‘Membership Juridification’
- IV: Conclusion
- Conclusion
- Further Material
