This chapter points out the orthodoxy in Australia of consulting foreign law as an ordinary part of the interpretation and application of ‘constitutional provisions with a common genetic or genealogical root’. Australian constitutional experience has demonstrated for more than a century how comparative constitutional analysis can illuminate the resolution of constitutional issues arising within a domestic legal system. In its exposition and development, no less than in its inspiration, Australian constitutional law has benefited from the consideration of foreign precedent. Constitutional ideas which have found expression in foreign judicial pronouncements have been appropriated and adapted when found to shed light on domestic constitutional issues, and discarded when not. That approach to the evaluation and utilization of foreign constitutional precedent has been nothing more than an aspect of the application of common law methodology to constitutional interpretation.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full
to access all content.